Do look up. Kyiv claimed Russia fired an intercontinental ballistic missile at Dnipro in Ukraine yesterday.
So what? If so, it would be the first time an ICBM – designed for use with nuclear warheads and normally considered an instrument of armageddon – has been used in a conflict.
Putin later claimed it was an experimental medium-range missile. Either way it will have a sobering effect on the West.
A line crossed. The missile type identified by the Ukrainian Air Force, an RS-26 Rubezh, is a medium-range ICBM whose development started in 2006 and was officially stopped in 2018 because it violated the INF. Russia is thought to have focused on the short-range Iskander-K ballistic missile since then, but it threatened to resume production of medium-range missiles, including the Rubezh, in July.
Alarms rung. Keir Starmer’s spokesperson said if the reports of a Rubezh launch were true it would be “another example of grave, reckless and escalatory behaviour from Russia”.
A high bar. After 1,000 days of war and months of grinding attrition, there has been a sudden crescendo this week in terms of missile types, prompted by the Biden administration’s wish to strengthen Ukraine vis-a-vis Russia before Trump takes over – and before any peace talks that ensue.
Escalate to deescalate. When Putin said it was in fact an intermediate “Oreshnik” missile, he added that Russia might now attack military facilities of countries allowing their weapons to be used against her.
World War 3? Ten or even five years ago headlines about Russia launching an ICBM in anger would have been implausible despite Putin’s record as a warmonger. They are now reality.
What’s more… Given Trump’s foreign policy priorities, it’s up to Europe to prioritise its own defence sooner rather than later. Without its help, Ukraine’s resistance can’t last long.
Read more: How fossil fuel exports pay for Russia’s trillion-dollar war in Ukraine
Listen: North Korean troops join Russia’s fight in Ukraine